The Democratization of Knowledge in Cyberspace and Its Reflection on the Cyberfeminism Approach

Document Type : Scientific-research

Authors

1 PhD student, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran

2 Department of Epistemology and Cognitive Sciences, Research Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought, Qom, Iran.

3 Department of Psychology and Family Studies, Kosar University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran.

Abstract

The Internet and its pervasiveness in various aspects of human life have had a broad impact on the methods of social activities and have created new ideas in the functioning of social movements, including feminism. Therefore, the development of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) has brought about widespread changes in feminist activities in recent decades. However, due to the specific epistemological characteristics of cyberspace, feminists have been influenced by these and have consequently presented different ways of functioning. Features like relativity in knowledge, changing the language of knowledge, and democratization can be considered epistemological characteristics of cyberspace. This paper uses a descriptive-analytical approach to explain how cyberfeminism are influenced by one of the key epistemological characteristics of cyberspace, namely the democratization of knowledge, on their approach. It seems that despite all the distinctive epistemic features of Information and Communication Technology, the democratization of knowledge in cyberspace is not unaffected by the social context in the real world.

Keywords


  • Balsamo, Anne. (1996). Technologies of the Gendered Body: Reading cyborg women. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Bahdi, Reem. (2000). Analyzing Women’s Use of the Internet the Right Debate. Chicago: Kent Law Review, Vol.75, No.3:869-897.

    Bargh, John & McKenna, Katelyn Y. A. (2004). “The internet and social life”. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573-590. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922

    Baym, Nancy K. (2006). Interpersonal life online. In L. A. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds). The Handbook of New Media, London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608245.n6

    Baudrillard, Jean. (1996). The System of Objects. trans. James Benedict: New York, Verso.

    Christiansen, Clifford J. (2006). “Technology and Three-Dimensional Theory”, Rethinking Media, Religion, and Culture. Translation: Masoud Aryayeenia. Tehran: Soroush. (in Persian)

    Coates, Jennifer (2004). Women, Men, and Language. London and New York: Routledge.

    Consalvo, M. (2003). Cyberfeminism. Encyclopedia of New Media. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications.

    Crocco, Margaret and Carmer, Judith and Meier, Ellen B. (2008). “(Never) Mind the Gap! Gender Equity in Social Studies Research on Technology in the Twenty-first Century”, Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 2(1): 19–36. 10.1108/17504970810867133

    Culnan, M. J. and Markus, M. L. (1987). “Information technologies”. In F. M. Fabin, J. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, and L. W. Porter (eds), Handbook of Organizational Computing: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 420–443), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Deaux, Kay and Major, Brenda. (1987). “Putting gender into context: an interactive model of gender-related behavior”. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369

    Ess, Charles. (1996). Philosophical Perspective On Computer-mediated Communication. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Gajjala, Radhika. (2000). “Internet constructs of identity and ignorance: ‘third-world’ contexts and cyberfeminism’. Works and Days, 35/36(18), 117-137.

    Grint, Keith and Gill, Ros. (1995). The gender-technology relation: Contemporary theory and research. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Halberstam, Judith. M. And Livingston, Ira. (1995). Posthuman Bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Haraway, Donna. (1988). “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”. Feminist Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 575-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

    Haraway, Donna . (1991). A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Donna Haraway Simians, Cyborgs and Women, The Reinvention of Nature. NewYork: Routledge.

    Hawthorne, Susan and Klein, Renate. (1999). Cyberfeminism: Connectivity, Critique and Creativity. North Melbourne: Spinifex Press Pty Ltd.

    Heim, Michael. (2011). The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality. Translation: Sarwnaz Torbati. Tehran: Rokhdad Now. (In Persian)

    Herring, Susan. (1994). Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: bringing familiar baggage to the new frontier [online]. CPSR: Computer Professionals For Social Resposibility.

    Retrieved before October 2002 from:

    http://cpsr.org/cpsr/gender/herring.txt.

    Herring, Susan. (1996). Computer Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-cultural Perspectives. Ameserdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Company.

    Houdart-Blazy, V. (1996). “The Information Society, A challenge for women”. Women of Europe dossier, N 44.

    Jordan, Tim. (1999). Cyberpower: The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace in the Internet. London and New York: Routledge.

    Kennedy, Tracy. (2007). “The Personal is Political: Feminist Blogging and Virtual Consciousness-Raising”. The Scholar & Feminist Online, 5(2).

    Kiesler, Sara and Jane, Siegel and McGuire, Timothy W. (1984). “Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication”. American Psychologist, Vol. 39, No. 10, 1123-1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123

    Klein, Renate and Hawthorne, Susan. (1996). Reclaiming Sisterhood: Radical Feminism as an Antidote to Theoretical Embodied Fragmentation of Women. Washington and London: Taylor & Francis.

    • Kling, Rob and McKim, Geoffrey and King, Adam. (2003). “A Bit More to IT: Scholarly Communication Forums as Socio-technical Interaction Networks”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(1): 47-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10154

    LaFrance, Marianne and Hecht, Marvin. (2000). “Gender and smiling: a meta-analysis”. In A. H. Fischer (ed.), Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives (pp. 97–118). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511628191.007

    Lea, Martin and Spears, Russell. (1991). “Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation and group-decision making”. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 34, 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(91)90045-9

    Lorde, Audre. (2007). Sister Outsider. Berkeley: Crossing Press.

    Markus, M. Lynne. (1994). “Finding a Happy Medium: Explaining the Negative Effects of Electronic Communication on Social Life at Work”. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2): 119–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/196734.196738}

    McCotter, Susanne. (2001). The journey of a beginning researcher. The Qualitative Report. 6(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2001.2004

    Moqaddam, Rezvan. (2019). Struggle for equality: From the constitutional revolution to cyberfeminism with a focus on the role of new media in the women’s movement in India. Freie: Universität Berlin.

    Mojtahedzadeh, Pirooz. (2019). Falsafeh va Karkard-e Geopolitic. Tehran: Sazmane Motaleʾe va Tadvine Kotob-e ʾOlume Ensani Daneshgahha. (In Persian)

    Munk, Nina. (2002). “Girl power!”. Fortune, 136(11), 133-139.

    Pierce, Julianne. (1980). First Cyberfeminist International.

    Retrieved September 1997 from:

    http://www.aec.at/www-ars/matrix.html.

    Ploug, Thomas. (2009). Ethics in Cyberspace: How Cyberspace May Influence Interpersonal Interaction. New York: Springer.

    Popper, Karl and Raimund, Sir. (1990). Unended Quest: an Intellectual Autobiography. translation: Iraj Aliabadi. Tehran: Islamic Revolution Publishing and Education Organization. (In Persian )

    Postmes, Tom and Spears, Russell and Lea, Martin. (1998). “Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication”. Communication Research, 25, 689–715. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/009365098025006006

    Postmes, Tom and Spears, Russell (2002). “Behavior online: does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality?”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1073–1083. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672022811006

    Reid, E. (1998), “The Self and the Internet: Variations on the Illusion of One Self”. in J. Gackenbach (ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications, San Diego (California) and London: Academic Press, pp. 29–42.

    Selfe, Cynthia and Meyer, Paul R. (1991). “Testing Claims for Online Conferences”. Written Communication, 8(2): 163–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088391008002002

    Shokouei, Hossein. (2003). Andishehaye No dar Falsafe Joghrafia. Tehran: Gita Shenasi. (In Persian )

    • Skalli, Loubna H. (2006). “Communicating Gender in the Public Sphere: Women and Information Technologies in the MENA”. Middle East Women’s Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2: 35-59. https://doi.org/10.2979/MEW.2006.2.2.35

    Wajcman, Judy. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.