Iman Rahim Nasirian
Abstract
Criticizing and rejecting the Western metaphysical tradition, which is searching for an absolute notion of Truth, Rorty describes the truth of beliefs as relative and dependent on the context of their origin. On the other hand, Allameh Tabatabai, with fundamentally metaphysical thinking, with an innovative ...
Read More
Criticizing and rejecting the Western metaphysical tradition, which is searching for an absolute notion of Truth, Rorty describes the truth of beliefs as relative and dependent on the context of their origin. On the other hand, Allameh Tabatabai, with fundamentally metaphysical thinking, with an innovative theory in the tradition of Islamic philosophy, considers some valid perceptions in the sphere of "action", namely, "Etebari perceptions," which, he specified, play the main role in realizing the evolution of humans' life. Unlike true perceptions, Etebari perceptions are relative and constantly evolving depending on environmental and social conditions. With a comparative-analytical approach, this essay will show that Allameh's " Etebari perceptions" theory has a significant affinity with Rorty's view on "relative truths." Although Rorty, different from Allameh, does not leave room for the absolute notion of Truth, this essay will propose a possibility of the congruence and compatibility of the thoughts of these two philosophers by analyzing this difference.
azadeh ebrahimy; mohammadali rostamian
Abstract
Philosophy is one of those disciplines which have either been countered by critics and opponents or approved by proponents. Some have considered philosophical rules baseless while others have emphasized their role in giving depth to our understanding of Quranic verses and traditions. One way to demonstrate ...
Read More
Philosophy is one of those disciplines which have either been countered by critics and opponents or approved by proponents. Some have considered philosophical rules baseless while others have emphasized their role in giving depth to our understanding of Quranic verses and traditions. One way to demonstrate the use of these principles in the interpretation of religious texts is the study of Quranic commentaries which have a philosophic orientation. Al-Mizan exegesis written by a philosopher commentator can show the application of philosophy in deepening our understanding of the noble verses of the Qur'an. In the present article, we examine the application of philosophical rules in the interpretation of the verses related to divine monotheism in a descriptive-analytical method. The conclusion is that philosophical principles have a great role to play in the interpretation of religious texts. In his interpretation of verses 73-84 of An'am, Allameh Tabatabai has illustrated the argument of Ibrahim on the oneness of God by proposing the rule of "the need of cause to an effect in the conservation phase". He has also used the rule of "a giver cannot be without an object" and the rule of "the consonance between cause and effect" in the interpretation of verse 258 of Al-Baghareh, and the rejection of Nimrod's argument that he gives life and death. To explain the argument of restraint in the interpretation of verse 22 of Al-Anbiya, he has used "the uniqueness of the abstract type" and "the consonance between cause and effect".
maryam khoshdel rohani; zahra rahmani
Abstract
AbstractIn a rational approach to the afterworld, there are questions beyond reason that confront theologians and mystics and philosophers, which is one of the issues discussed in the resurrection and later life. Serious theologians, philosophers, and commentators are in charge of the quality of punishment ...
Read More
AbstractIn a rational approach to the afterworld, there are questions beyond reason that confront theologians and mystics and philosophers, which is one of the issues discussed in the resurrection and later life. Serious theologians, philosophers, and commentators are in charge of the quality of punishment and divine punishment for human actions .In the meantime, the amount of punishment and the duration of the punishment in the torment has affected most of the minds, because in Islam some of the sins of immortality have been punished and many verses of the Holy Quran have confirmed this .But the argument here is whether eternity in Hell will cause eternity in torment or whether the two immortals are at odds with one another .The vast majority of Islamic theologians and commentators, including the Imamiyyah, Ash'arites, and Mu'tazilites, have believed in the eternity of punishment for some inferno.There is a similar belief among Muslim philosophers, but among them Ibn al-'Arabi and his followers have a particular justification for retribution; they have used this argument differently for rational and transmutative reasons. Among the philosophers, commentators and traditions, Mulla Mohsen Feiz Kashani's theory is discussed and since Mullah Kashani is one of the influencers of Ibn Arabi's theory in this issue, we are trying to express Ibn Arabi's viewpoint.We are here to analyze the theory of Faiz Kashani in this regard. In short, it can be stated that the late Faiz, following Ibn Arabi, insisted on not being eternally tormented and saw no relation between eternity in hell and eternity in retribution; For all beings, the torment of the immortals in Hell is for a certain period of time, and then the Hell will enjoy a different kind of heavenly blessings that is proportionate to their temperament
