Participation and Presence: A Reflection on the Relation between the First Principle and the World in Plotinus' Philosophy

Document Type : Scientific-research

Authors

1 PhD Student, Philosophy Department, Faculty of Humanities and Literature, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Philosophy Department, Faculty of Humanities and Literature, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

One of the challenging issues in Plotinus’ philosophy is the relation between the One (the Foundation) and the world, which has given rise to two distinct interpretive approaches. The central question in these two interpretive traditions revolves around explaining the characterization of the One as "beyond being". According to one interpretation, the "beyond being" principle is pure being devoid of form. In contrast, the rival interpretation holds that the beyond being principle transcends absolute being altogether. This article seeks to address the question of the relation between the One and the world and, subsequently, to adjudicate between these two interpretive approaches by examining the nature of the One’s priority over the world. Through an analysis of the priority, it will be demonstrated that the simplicity and transcendence of the One implies a certain mode of priority which negates any participatory relation between the One and the world. Instead, it leads to a non-participatory presence of the One in the world, a conclusion that aligns with the implications of the second interpretation.

Keywords

References

Amini, S., & Naji Isfahani, H. (2023). “An Investigation of the Hierarchy of Being in Plotinus' Philosophical System”. Maʿrifat-i Falsafi, 20(2), 25-40. [In Persian]
Aristotle (1991). Complete Works, translated and edited by J. Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Aubry, G. (2022). The One as First Principle of All in L. P. Gerson and J. Wilberding (eds.), The New Cambridge Companion to Plotinus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770255
Banner, N. (2018). Philosophic Silence and the One in Plotinus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316650790
Bradshaw, D. (2004). Aristotle East and West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482489
Bussanich, J. (1996). Plotinus's metaphysics of the One in L. P. Gerson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521470935
Corrigan, K. (1984). “A Philosophical Precursor to the Theory of Essence and Existence in St. Thomas Aquinas”. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 48, 219-240. https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.1984.0040
Corrigan, K. (1996). Essence and existence in the Enneads in L. P. Gerson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521470935
Dillon, J. (1977). The Middle Platonists. New York: Cornell University Press.
Emilsson, E. K. (1995). “Plotinus on the Objects of Thought”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 77, 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.1995.77.1.21
Emilsson, E. K. (2007). Plotinus on Intellect. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199281701.001.0001
Emilsson, E. K. (2017). Plotinus. London: Routledge.
Gerson, L. P. (1994). Plotinus (Arguments of the Philosophers). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2008.0931
Gerson, L. P. (2014). Ennead V.5: That the Intelligibles are not External to the Intellect, and on the Good, Translation, Introduction and Commentary. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.
Halfwassen, J. (2021). Plotinus, Neoplatonism and the Transcendence of the One, edited and translated with an introduction by C. S. O’Brien. Ohio: Franciscan University Press.
Heidarpur Kiaʾi, A. (2014). “Plotinus' System of Thought on The One and its Attributes”. Philosophy of Religion, 11(2), 325-348. https://doi.org/10.22059/jpht.2014.51718 [In Persian]
Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn ibn ʿAbdullāh (1984). Al-Ilāhīyāt al-Shifāʾ. Qom: Maktabat al-Marʿashī al-Najafī.
Judson, L. (2019). Aristotle Metaphysics Book Λ. Clarendon Press.
Kahnuji, M. (2009). “Plotnius’ the One & the Station of Essence”. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 10(4(40)), 127-156. https://doi.org/0.22091/pfk.2009.201 [In Persian]
Kalligas, P. (2014). The Enneads of Plotinus: A Commentary, Volume 1, translated by Nickolaos Koutras. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kalligas, P. (2023). The Enneads of Plotinus: A Commentary, Volume 2, translated by Nickolaos Koutras. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Makin, S. (2006). Aristotle: Metaphysics Theta. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Meijer, P. A. (1992). Plotinus on the Good or the One (Ennead VI, 9: An Analytical Commentary). Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.
Merlan, P. (1967). Greek Philosophy from Plato to Plotinus in A. H. Armstrong (ed.), The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521040549
Nikulin, D. (2019). Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190662363.001.0001
O’Meara, D. (1996). The Hierarchical Ordering of Reality in Plotinus in L. P. Gerson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521470935
Perl, E. (2007). Theophany: The Neoplatonic Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite. New York: State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.0.0171
Perl, E. (2015). Ennead 5.1: On the Three Primary Levels of Reality, translation, introduction and commentary. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.
Peramatzis, M. (2011). Priority in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Plato (1971). Sophist, translated by F. M. Cornford. in E. Hamilton & H. Cairms (eds.), The Collected Dialogues of Plato including the Letters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Plotinus (2018). The Enneads, edited by L. P. Gerson, and translated by G. Boys-Stones, J. M. Dillon, L. P. Gerson, R. A. King, A. Smith and J. Wilberding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil202040118
Proclus (1963). The Elements of Theology, translation, introduction and commentary by E. R. Dodds. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198140979.001.0001
Proclus (1987). Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides, translated by G. R. Morrow and J. M. Dillon. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Proclus (1995). The Theology of Plato, translated by Thomas Taylor. Somereset: Prometheus Trust.
Rabin, G. (2018). Grounding Orthodoxy and the Layered Conception in R. Bliss and G. Priest (eds.), Reality and its Structure: Essays in Fundamentality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755630.001.0001
Ṣadr al-Dīn Shīrāzī, Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm (1989). Al-Ḥikmah al-Mutaʿāliyah fī al-Asfār al-Arbaʿah al-ʿAqlīyah. Qom: Maktabat al-Muṣṭafawī.
Schaffer, J. (2012). Grounding, Transitivity, and Contrastivity in F. Correia, and B. Shnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139149136
Wallis, R. T. (1987). Scepticism and Neoplatonism in Wolfgang Haase (ed.), Rise and Decline of the Roman World, Vol. 36.2. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics