There are different opinions about the Primal Matter among slamic philosophers. On the types and numbers of substances have been presented various views. One of the reasons for this disagreement is that some put Primal Matter among substances And others do not this. People like Abu al-Barakat Baghdadi and Sheikh Ishraq and at the present time , People like Motahari and Mesbah consider it to be rejected. although Sadr al-Motaalehin Shirazi explains in detail about Primal Matter and it is famous that he accepts it but by summing up his particular views on Primal Matter such as the non-existence of Primal Matter and inteligible and non-causality for it in relation to Form and abstraction Primal Matter of form and … As well as according to the principles such as the primacy of existence ,existential gradation and of the Division of self-subsistent existence and connective being, It can be seen that in terms of Mulla Sadra Primal Matter is secondary intelligible.
Shameli, G., kakaie, G., & bonyani, M. (2018). Primal Matter: first intelligible or secondary intelligible in transcendent philosophy?. The Mirror of Knowledge, 18(4), 1-20.
MLA
Gholamreza Shameli; ghasem kakaie; mohammad bonyani. "Primal Matter: first intelligible or secondary intelligible in transcendent philosophy?", The Mirror of Knowledge, 18, 4, 2018, 1-20.
HARVARD
Shameli, G., kakaie, G., bonyani, M. (2018). 'Primal Matter: first intelligible or secondary intelligible in transcendent philosophy?', The Mirror of Knowledge, 18(4), pp. 1-20.
VANCOUVER
Shameli, G., kakaie, G., bonyani, M. Primal Matter: first intelligible or secondary intelligible in transcendent philosophy?. The Mirror of Knowledge, 2018; 18(4): 1-20.
)