Critical Evaluation of Fayyāzi’s Perspective on God Possessing an Quiddity

Document Type : Scientific-research

Authors

1 Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology, University of Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Theology, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The discussion of God's lack of essence in the strict sense is one of the significant topics in Islamic philosophy, with profound implications for discussions in metaphysics in its strict sense, such as divine unity, knowledge of the Divine, the simplicity of God's essence, the absence of a common genus between the necessary and contingent beings, and the non-causality of the Necessary Being. Philosophers of the Peripatetic and Transcendent Philosophy traditions have presented various arguments in defense of God's pure existence and the negation of essence from Him. Among them, a contemporary Islamic philosopher (Gholamreza Fayyāzi) has critiqued these arguments and, by presenting rational and transmitted  evidence, concluded that God possesses an essence. His unique interpretation of the conceptual nature of essence in Transcendent Philosophy has played a significant role in articulating his claim. This study, conducted through a descriptive-analytical method with a documentary approach, seeks to describe and evaluate Fayyāzi’s perspective. The findings will demonstrate that his critiques of the philosophers' arguments regarding God's lack of quiddity are not valid, and the rational and transmitted  evidence he claims to support God's possession of essence is not conclusive.

Keywords


Babawiyyah, Muhammad bin Ali (2004). Tawhid. Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute.
Dezhbani Moqaddam, F. (2015). “Examining and Criticizing the Views of Fakhr Razi and Mulla Sadra on the Nature of God”. Institute for Humanities and Culture Studies, 6(2), 59-74. [In Persian]
Esmaʿili, M. (2012). “Does God Have a Quiddity?” Journal of Kalam Islami, 21(82), 145-172. [In Persian]
Farabi, Mahmmad Ibn Mahmmad (2008). Philosophical Treatises. Tehran: Entesharat Elmi Va Fareangi.
Fayyāzi, G. R. (2008). Being and Quiddity in the Sadrani School. Qom: Hawza and University Research Center. [In Persian]
Fayyāzi, G. R., & Naqavi, R. (2021). “Criticism and Examination of the Arguments for Denying the Quiddity of the Necessary Being”. Metaphysical Investigations, 2(3), 36-58. [In Persian]
Hoseini, A., Seyedi, M., & Hashemi, M. (2017). “Criticism of Fakhr al-Razi'sTtheory on the Quiddity of the Necessary Being”. Qabasat, 22(86), 149-166. [In Persian]
Ibn Sina, Hussein Ibn ʿAbdullah (2004). Explanation of the Signs and Warnings of Tusi. Qom: Bustan-e Ketab.
Ibn Sina, Hussein Ibn ʿAbdullah (1404 AH). Al-Taʿliqat. Qom: Maktab Al-Iʿlam Al-Islami.
Javadi Amoli, A. (2007). Rahiq Makthum. Qom: Israʾ. [In Persian]
Karimi, H. (1977). “Examining the Evidence and Effect of the Principality of Existence in the Issue of the Necessary Being’s Essence”. Journal of Essays in Islamic Philosophy and Theology, 110(55), 25–26. [In Persian]
Kulaini, Muhammad ibn Yaʿqub (1980). Usul al-Kafi. Beirut: Dar al-Taʿarif al-Matbuʿat.
Majlisi, M. B. (2009). Bihar al-Anwar. Beirut: Dar al-Hiya al-Turaht al-Arabi.
Misbah Yazdi, M. T. (1999). Teaching Philosophy. Tehran: International Publishing Company. [In Persian]
Motahhari, M. (1997). Complete Works. Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian]
Nabaviyan, S. M. M. (2016). Essays in Islamic Philosophy. Qom: Hekmat-e-Islami Publications.
Nabaviyan, S. M. M. (2020). A New Look at Islamic Philosophy. Qom: Hekmat-e-Islami Publications. [In Persian]
ʿUbudiyyat, A. (2024). Lecture in vocal file.
Qomi, A. (2011). Mafatih al-Janan. Tehran: Yasin Publications.
RazghiFam, H. (2017). “Rereading the Arguments for Denying the Quiddity of God from the Perspective of Islamic Philosophers”. Scientific-Research Biannual Journal of Nasim-e-Kherad, 3(2), 31-54.
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (2021). Al-Shawahid al Ruboobiyyah. Qom: Bostan Kitab.
Saraj, S., & Habibimanesh, H. (2015). “The principle of ‘Alhaqqu Mahiyyatuhu Inniyyatuhu’ in the Tradition of Islamic and Greek Philosophy”. History of Islam, 2(6), 109-124. [In Persian]
Tabarsi, Ahmad Ibn Ali (1982). Al-Ihtejaj ʿAla Ahl al-Lijaj. Mashhad: Nashr Al-Mortaza.
Tabatabaʾi, M. H. (1993). Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism; with a Footnote by Morteza Motahhari. Vol. 5. Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian]
Tabatabaʾi, M. H. (2007). Nihayyah al-Hikmah. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Training Institute.