Akbar Orvati Movafagh; Abolghasem Asadi
Abstract
the discussion of divine information and how to define , describe and explain them is of the most important and fundamental issues in words and philosophy during the history of human thought . among the divine attributes which are subject to many scientific controversies , the quality of science and ...
Read More
the discussion of divine information and how to define , describe and explain them is of the most important and fundamental issues in words and philosophy during the history of human thought . among the divine attributes which are subject to many scientific controversies , the quality of science and will and the relationship between them are . Is the science of will ? or does it not involve the science and its function ? in other words , is the action of the independent subject immediately after reason and is only caused by it , or that it is sufficient for realization of an act of will of will to it and there is no necessity for the interference of reason . in this paper , the analytical - analytical method of reason and the relation between them are studied from the viewpoint of sheikh ibn Sina and Rene Descartes . according to ibn Sina , reason is preceded by the will and effect of the cause and effect of the cause and effect on all events and in his view the system of creation is good , but Descartes , contrary to Ibn Sina , has the will on reason - both in man and in God . In Descartes ' view , God is the creator of entities and the quiddities maker's . Thus , in his view , even the eternal truths depend on the will of God
majid ahsan; میلاد نوری یالقوزآغاجی
Volume 18, Issue 2 , January 0, , Pages 29-42
Abstract
The issue of knowledge over world objects is one of the most controversial issues in the history of philosophy. Meanwhile, dealing with knowledge without a firm belief in the relationship between cognitive faculties and the objects of knowledge is almost impossible. One type of knowledge is rational ...
Read More
The issue of knowledge over world objects is one of the most controversial issues in the history of philosophy. Meanwhile, dealing with knowledge without a firm belief in the relationship between cognitive faculties and the objects of knowledge is almost impossible. One type of knowledge is rational knowledge which relies on the relationship between intelligent and intelligible. Avicenna is one of those philosophers who have discussed this issue in great detail. In some cases, he has provided support explicitly or implicitly for the unification of intelligent and intelligible, and in some other cases he seems to reject it. This dual position has made Avicenna’s conflict of opinion a significant issue.This issue and the way to deal with it has been discussed by philosophers. The present article is an attempt to investigate the inadequacies in Avicenna’s conflict of opinion and presents a new way of dealing with this conflict using av historical frame of analysis.
Mitra (Zahra) Poursina; Hossein Ejtehadian; Fatemeh (Mahnaz) Tavakoli
Volume 17, Issue 2 , January 0, , Pages 46-72
Abstract
Although al-Ghazali is known as a critic of philosophers, his intellectual approach is full of rational and philosophical argumentations. That is why, some scholars have taken the view that al-Ghazali has had a big contribution to the rationalization of the Islamic culture and especially in transferring ...
Read More
Although al-Ghazali is known as a critic of philosophers, his intellectual approach is full of rational and philosophical argumentations. That is why, some scholars have taken the view that al-Ghazali has had a big contribution to the rationalization of the Islamic culture and especially in transferring Avicenna's thoughts to his successors. He has also used Avicenna's thought foundations in his religious and mystical theorizations. The present article is an attempt to analyze the relationship between the rational knowledge and the heart-knowledge based on al-Ghazali’s rational mysticism and the main pillars of the new approaches to his works in the last two decades. Based on these bases, it will be argued that the achievement of the highest level of knowledge, which is associated to the heart in al-Ghazali’s thought, is made possible after rational preliminaries. Even the heart knowledge itself is in principle equal to the perfection of the rational knowledge.
ali monsefi; seyyedmohammadesmaeil seyyedhashemi
Volume 17, Issue 1 , January 0, , Pages 81-106
Abstract
Abstract
One of the important subjects of Theology is the Imams knowledge and the aspects of their knowledge. In the present study, which attempted to inspect this subject, different issues such as the scope of Imam's knowledge, source and the aspects of their knowledge and their unseen knowledge from ...
Read More
Abstract
One of the important subjects of Theology is the Imams knowledge and the aspects of their knowledge. In the present study, which attempted to inspect this subject, different issues such as the scope of Imam's knowledge, source and the aspects of their knowledge and their unseen knowledge from the viewpoint of Shiite scholastic theologians were investigated.
Having studied this scholastic theologian’ stances, interpretations and impressions of verses and narrations, it is concluded that the Shiite scholastic theologians had no doubt or differences concerning the Imams’ knowledge needed to explain the laws and Islamic sciences, Inheritance of the Holy Prophet PBUH and the validity of their knowledge. But there are controversies among scholastic theologians whether they acquired the laws and Islamic sciences through the unseen or other sources of their knowledge.
