نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه فلسفه، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
2 گروه علوم سیاسی، ادیان و عرفان، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In Indian mystical schools, as in most mystical schools, the epistemological ability of reason is doubted. Nagarjuna also uses the mystical skepticism of the Upanishads and the specific materialism of Buddhist silence, as well as the method of reasoning known as the sliding eel, in order to offer special methods for discovering the truths of existence in addition to weakening reason. The question is whether Nagarjuna's skeptical views lead to a kind of epistemological and ontological nihilism. In this article, while following the skeptical tradition in India and finding its roots in the Rig Veda, the Upanishads and early Buddhist texts, by explaining the types of arguments of Nagarjuna, we find out that by criticizing epistemological fundamentalism and rejecting causality and emphasizing the difference between the product of thought, reason and heart, we away from apparent nihilism and leads to a kind of deep mystical realism that emphasizes moral and practical behavior. Also, like Ibn Arabi, in order to achieve peace of mind and true knowledge, Nagarjuna emphasizes avoiding vices, devaluing the five senses, and getting rid of carnal interests. This spiritual and mental conduct becomes the basis for a chosen person (Nagarjuna) or a divine gift (Ibn Arabi). Such a person has the superior cognitive power of the heart. Therefore, Nagarjuna's skepticism about intellectual ability is a prelude to accepting a kind of mystical metaphysics and its inherent knowledge in the faculty that Ibn Arabi calls the heart and relates the acquisition of wisdom and worldly knowledge to it. A wisdom that agrees with mystical realism, which considers the whole world to be a collection of signs of the Supreme Being.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)