The subject of this article is to explain the issue of principality in making and to state its difference from principality in actualization. In current philosophy, two types of principality are discussed. These two types of principality have different requirements and consequences, and in some cases, one is used instead of the other. As for Suhrawardi's view on the principality of existence, some have assumed that he believes in the principality of the essence and validity of existence, which is similar to the principality and validity of Mulla Sadra philosophy, while the principality and validity of the Mulla Sadra school was not common in Suhrawardi's era. Therefore, to avoid such misconceptions, between these two types of principality. The author has attempted to explain principality in forgery and examine and investigate its differences with principality in the position of actualization. This article was conducted using a descriptive-analytical method. Among the results and achievements of this article is the distinction between the views of scholars, mystics, and theologians on the issue of forgery and the criticism of some of the views of Mulla Sadra and his commentators for not distinguishing the issue of forgery in terms of philosophical and mystical cosmology.