sardar dekami; mohammad saeedi mehr; reza akbarian
Volume 18, Issue 3 , January 0, Pages 1-28
Abstract
Abstract: With represent by distinction between existence and quiddity and ago Mirdamad, direct and indirect position of muslim philosophers about principality of one of these two or both of them- and also sentences about verbal disagreement among some of them- in their works, are seen. Since mollasadra ...
Read More
Abstract: With represent by distinction between existence and quiddity and ago Mirdamad, direct and indirect position of muslim philosophers about principality of one of these two or both of them- and also sentences about verbal disagreement among some of them- in their works, are seen. Since mollasadra consider the existence as a principality thing and open the season about principality of existence, the issue of verbal disagreement is seen in some of work of Lahiji, disciple of him, and many of researchers believe that theory. In this article we expose, based on some of interpretation of principality of existence, for they believe objectivity for existence and quiddity, the possibility of verbal disagreement is denied. In some interpretations that the existence has objectivity and it has those qualities, since these qualities are in contrast with qualities of quiddity, the quarrel is real. In this article we survey the relation between verbal disagreement and self-evident of this issue, and we survey this issue that the reasons of principality is in agreement with verbal disagreement or not.
mustafa zali
Volume 18, Issue 3 , January 0, Pages 29-50
Abstract
One of the most famous and most important doctrines of Ibn Sina’s metaphysics is the distinction between essence and existence: a pivotal and controversial one. On the one hand, this distinction paves the way for some new metaphysical innovations to be introduced, but on the other hand it gives ...
Read More
One of the most famous and most important doctrines of Ibn Sina’s metaphysics is the distinction between essence and existence: a pivotal and controversial one. On the one hand, this distinction paves the way for some new metaphysical innovations to be introduced, but on the other hand it gives way to serious criticism to be levelled against Ibn Sina’s philosophy. Meanwhile, an issue that has not been yet been resolved is whether this is a conceptual or ontological distinction and if it is ontological whether it has a nonessential signification or not. After reviewing the different views on this problem and representing a clear depiction of the point of controversy, this study shows that although all metaphysical solutions of Ibn Sina are not based on this distinction, there are some textual evidence and some solutions which imply this distinction. Then, by analyzing the concept of “addition’’ as a central concept to explain the realization of essence and existence in the external world, it is demonstrated that in Ibn Sina’s metaphysics, this concept does not imply the dependence of existence to essence. In fact, addition means that both essence and existence are realized in the external world in a manner that existence entails essence.
majid mollayusefi; Abuzar ghaedi fard
Volume 18, Issue 3 , January 0, Pages 51-70
Abstract
n a paper titled "The difficulties of the book of metaphysics," Amir Maziar argued that Aristotle, in the second book of Metaphysics (beta), described the difficulties that later metaphysics sought to find the answer to these difficulties. They are In this paper, it has been shown that the way that Aristotle ...
Read More
n a paper titled "The difficulties of the book of metaphysics," Amir Maziar argued that Aristotle, in the second book of Metaphysics (beta), described the difficulties that later metaphysics sought to find the answer to these difficulties. They are In this paper, it has been shown that the way that Aristotle has taken for his own philosophy has four steps that addressing the difficulty is the first step in this approach. The four steps of Aristotle's Apurianism are: (1) philosophical distortion (the expression of the difficulty of the subject), (2) the expression of opinions in response to difficulty, (3) the analysis of existing opinions, and (4) the discovery of truth (philosophical calm). Each of these steps has applications and goals that make it different from other methods. Aristotle's method, known as Apuria's method, is different from what has been called "dialectic" since philosophical philosophy, and philosophers such as Socrates and Plato. The first part of this article deals with the methodology of Aristotle, and stated the goals and application of each step of Apuria according to him. Zeta's book is one of the most important books of metaphysics, which expresses Aristotle's philosophical thinking. In this book Aristotle seeks to find the truth of essence In the second part of this article, how to apply Apuria's method in Zeta's book is shown. It has been shown in this section that although the arrangement of some of Zeta's topics and parts of the book is not precise, it is not only the logical order of these inferential arguments, knowing that the order of the sections of this book follows the method of Aristotle's theory. And it is better understood, but it also reduces the difficulty of understanding the topics of this book
reza gandomi nasrabadi
Volume 18, Issue 3 , January 0, Pages 71-86
Abstract
To provide a clear and distinguished concept on comparative philosophy, one should say precisely that what comparative philosophy is and is not. By examining the ratio of philosophical philosophy to philosophy, as well as its relation to global philosophy, Perennial Philosophy and the intercultural philosophy ...
Read More
To provide a clear and distinguished concept on comparative philosophy, one should say precisely that what comparative philosophy is and is not. By examining the ratio of philosophical philosophy to philosophy, as well as its relation to global philosophy, Perennial Philosophy and the intercultural philosophy can in part be understood by its nature. In that comparative philosophy should be regarded as a branch of philosophy Or an independent trend in philosophy along with other tendencies, Or as a methodological strategy, much debate has been made.
In this vein, the necessity and goals of comparative philosophy can highly override the opinions of thinkers on comparison issue; in other words, one can limit to list similarities and differences or one of them or one can attempt to resolve today human’s problems by looking at the past and creating a third space and/or to boast information drawn from comparative studies. It is expected that by deepening one’s thoughts and familiarity with existing capacities and capabilities in other intellectual tradition, one can resolve some difficulties in intellectual world.
abdolhadi rezaeetalarposhti; دکتر محمد رضا ضمیری; mohammad sadegh jamshidi
Volume 18, Issue 3 , January 0, Pages 87-108
Abstract
Moral relativism is one of the most important topics in moral philosophy that has created a lot of challenges and reactions from moral piety and post- structuralist mortality perspectives. In its principles and morality values, moral relativism benefits from the bases of ontology, epistemology and anthropology ...
Read More
Moral relativism is one of the most important topics in moral philosophy that has created a lot of challenges and reactions from moral piety and post- structuralist mortality perspectives. In its principles and morality values, moral relativism benefits from the bases of ontology, epistemology and anthropology relying on a philosophical theological approach. Its origins can be found in issues such as skepticism, rationalism, pluralism, relativism in wisdom and cognition, humanism and unreligious self-centeredness. This philosophic view has instituted a practicable morality under which contemporary man has been deprived from true perfection informed by the Islamic sources since human beings’ inclination toward moral relativity on the one hand and its consequences on the other hand have moved human being away from spiritual teachings and made them overlook absolute and subjective morality which is informed by qur’anic verses and Islamic narratives. Adopting an analytic explanatory approach, the present article tries to show that moral relativism is inefficient in achieving the ultimate goal of morality.
ٍEsamil Ghaedi; asghar vaezi
Volume 18, Issue 3 , January 0, Pages 109-138
Abstract
This paper studies three contemporary Iranian thinkers’ hermeneutic approaches to the Qur’an and their orientations to modern hermeneutic trends. Allameh Tabataba’i argues that the Qur’an contains several meanings each of which determined by God’s intention. Accordingly, ...
Read More
This paper studies three contemporary Iranian thinkers’ hermeneutic approaches to the Qur’an and their orientations to modern hermeneutic trends. Allameh Tabataba’i argues that the Qur’an contains several meanings each of which determined by God’s intention. Accordingly, Allameh is close to romantic hermeneutics. Soroush argues that the meaning of the Qur’an, like any other text, is independent from the author’s intention, therefore he is consistent with philosophical hermeneutics. Finally, Mojtahed Shabestari, in some of his writings, argues for the original meaning of the Qur’an. Nevertheless, he accepts the possibility of different valid interpretations and borrows some aspects of romantic hermeneutics and some of philosophical hermeneutics.
farhad Ahmadi Ashtiani; Abolfazl Khosh manesh
Volume 18, Issue 3 , January 0, Pages 139-160
Abstract
The confrontation of Shi'ism with another Islamic distinction in the context of verbal discussions has more than any other topic on the subject of Imamate. Therefore, the precise and accurate foundation of Imamat's discussions and the inclusion of the gravity of these discussions on the Holy Qur'an has ...
Read More
The confrontation of Shi'ism with another Islamic distinction in the context of verbal discussions has more than any other topic on the subject of Imamate. Therefore, the precise and accurate foundation of Imamat's discussions and the inclusion of the gravity of these discussions on the Holy Qur'an has always been the focus of attention of the great Shi'a scholars in the fields of theology, philosophy and interpretation. In this regard, the present research, based on the phenomenological suspension method, means the seizure and suspension of any verdict on the object being studied and the mere attention to the description of what appeared in the field of consciousness, in the verse 79 of the surah of Hajar as the central verse Among the three categories of verses in this chapter, he recounts. This phenomenological study shows the unity of the narrative style governing these three categories of verses and the correspondence between their elements. Accordingly, Imamate means to form and formulate a collection and maintain its durability and survival. This meaning in all Quranic verses the word "Imam" provides a meaningful meaning in accordance with the Qur'anic status and consistent with Quranic teachings. This approach combines the meanings of the dispersed meanings of Imamate in the fields of the word, theology and the interpretation of the meaning of the discussions of the Imamate on the Holy Quran and the attention to the Imam's attributes in it, serves a wider circle of the verses and the ability to plan the subject of Imamate in the discourse of belief Shiite extraterritoriality and against the flow of Quranicity and is effective in strengthening the concepts mentioned in the Shi'a narratives around the Imamate.