نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی
نویسنده
هیئت علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Some Critics believe that the theory of Prophetic Dreams goes against Quran in four different ways. Quranic textual evidences, teachings and notions are sited as proof. The evaluation of these arguments shows that these criticisms rest on confusion of phenomenal topics with theological ones or circular invoking of of the rival theory of Recitation. The presupposition common to all these critics says that a second order theory can be proved by first order arguments.